Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume I. Organization and Procedures. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc ) was first published in in two volumes and contained a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously. Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume II. Design Certification and. Continuing Airworthiness. Approved by the Secretary General.
|Published (Last):||8 January 2015|
|PDF File Size:||5.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
For operators based dic the EU, for whom EASA regulations do not apply, continuing airworthiness is still managed in a controlled manner but the regulations are within the rules for the operator. Recognition can be unilateral, bilateral or multilateral. This is an approved organisation responsible for implementation of continuing airworthiness management tasks.
Sustainment usually relates to the requirement manuap communicate any change to the conditions under which the recognition was originally issued. Limitations and Constraints 4. Although the owner bears the legal responsibility for continuing airworthiness, there is very much a shared responsibility between:. Common to the efforts between these agencies is the use of a standardized assessment tool, based on ICAO documents references g.
TAM Part 2, Chapter 5 — Type Design Examination TDE describes the rules and standards for the acceptance of work performed, and airworthiness artefacts issued, by other airworthiness authorities in relation to initial type certification or major design change approval.
While MAAs may closely align with many of the international civilian airworthiness processes, by necessity, military aviation has a different risk context and will employ military design standards.
Depending on how it is structured within the state, the airworthiness authority may be established as a sub-component of the larger Civil Aviation Authority.
Military Authorities Recognition Question Set. Safety and airworthiness are sovereign responsibilities. The report provides an overall assessment of acceptability and identifies any areas that require clarification through an onsite review. Cranfield University Content control: The generic term for any of the following: The process airworthinees which the TAA will undertake this recognition could include: This also includes acceptance of FAA organizational approvals related to maintenance, design, manufacturing and materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products.
Furthermore, TAA recognition of another AA neither implies, nor requires, that the authority must make any changes to their airworthiness management systems as a result of the recognition. Continuing Airworthiness management is the process by which an aircraft is kept in a condition where it remains airworthy throughout its life – or in other wordsi. To enable the provisions of these two TAM chapters, there is a requirement to identify the other regulatory authorities that are acceptable to the TAA and detail the methodology used to establish acceptability.
Airdorthiness — Civil Aviation Authorities 4. Timely response is required where airworthiness is affected, which means devising and provisioning rectification action, and promulgating the necessary information to restore airwortjiness levels.
For the DND TAA and the Technical Airworthiness Program, this relates to airworthiness certification, production oversight and airworthiness inspection airworthineas airworthiness. Within a military organization, airworthiness and aviation responsibility may be spread across a number of organizations, and enforcement may only be possible through internal regulations, rules and contracts.
For example, for most military organizations, operational effectiveness is paramount and, therefore, aviation safety objectives must be balanced against the need to accept higher levels of risk wherever operational circumstances dictate.
Normally, these work products will have received an airworthiness approval or other form of authorization from an AA. Other military regulators may be organized differently, for example: This standardized assessment tool has been tailored for the military context and takes the form of a odc set called the Military Authorities Recognition Question set MARQ reference i. It is useful to compare Continued and Continuing as they are sometimes used interchangeably. It remains the responsibility of the TAA to account for any differences in standards and processes, and to decide how any identified gaps are to be managed.
Once the regulatory Section Heads have completed their reviews, they provide a summary of their findings to DTAES 2, who collates them into a preliminary report. Reference j represents a TAA staff instruction that covers how companies providing services under contract to DND are recognized.
In the words of ICAO:. The recognition process follows four basic phases:. This also includes acceptance of TCCA organizational approvals related to maintenance, design, manufacturing and materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products; and U.
The ultimate responsibility for continued airworthiness is assigned in ICAO Annex 8 to the State of Design but the programme to achieve continuing airworthiness is a matter for the State of Registry.
Finally, in the military context, recognition can improve flexibility and capacity during joint operations. For each of its aircraft, the approved CAMO is required to carry out the following functions. The government statutory authority in each country that oversees coc approval and regulation of civil aviation.
Furthermore, there is no single, internationally recognized organization that sets standards or harmonizes the military airworthiness and aviation requirements of MAAs.
Continuing Airworthiness is therefore not just the maintenance of aircraft and equipment, but also involves monitoring performance of products in service. Retrieved from ” https: DTAES 2 maintains a record of individual evaluator findings and coordinates with the AA being assessed to build a schedule airworthjness the onsite review. The national military airworthiness authority of a state responsible for the airworthiness of the 97600 aircraft of that state.