The Archko Volume. By John Baskette, AIA Research Associate. Hi folks! I’ve just finished a book called _The Archko Volume_ Anyone else have any. The Archko volume; or, The archeological writings of the Sanhedrim and Talmuds of the Jews. (Intra secus.) These are the official documents made in these. W. D. Mahan published a book entitled The Archko Volume. It is the results of his search for 1st century documents. Rev Mahan wrote that his research took him.
|Published (Last):||15 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||10.68 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.23 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Why, the great teacher Gammaliel himself!
I haven’t read this work as you have, but I have read about it in a book that I have that’s probably out of print, but it’s a terrific book if you can find it: If fact is mixed with fiction, truth with error, then we would be guilty of building with untempered mortar. The voljmes is both a confession and a resignation from his high office. I am skeptical and suspicious of those who become authorities on anything, volumex religion.
In this scenario, the all knowing God is subject to the sinful, flawed and limited knowledge of man, indeed, dependent on man, to clarify what He meant. I read it and I enjoyed it.
Man refuses to do as God asks him so he becomes a Protest-ant. Could it be this that Rev Mahan was first shown by the German visitor to his home that began his “quest”?
I still urge you to drop this Archko fake, lest it undermine your credibility and authority as a teacher when your students investigate this fake for themselves and wonder why you passed the purest fraud off as a reliable historical source which corroborates the Biblical accounts! I have read Tony Breeden and his inspired, for lack of a better word—discernments.
The cynical bookseller merely sought cash by exploiting the credulity of rural Christians in the USA. This volume has been reprinted many times under various titles, most often as The Archko Volume or Archko Library.
Think of how much damage can be done by Christians using false evidence to back the historicity of the Gospels! Strikingly, there is no mention in the Archko Volume that the Babe would be lying in a manger wrapped in swaddling clothes as a sign to the shepherds that they had found the Christ Child. It was nice to read what other people wrote about at that time. So when it records the high priest, Caiaphas, reporting that the soldiers were excited about what they had seen and that he regretted posting them as guards at the tomb of Jesus because they were helping to establish what he was trying to prevent, you reject that.
The funerals will remind you who really won. Vantberger of New York, for English translation.
One will just have to believe that Rev. In the end Mahan was brought before a church court, wrchko of forgery, and suspended for a year; and he passes out of the light at that point.
But we can check the two editions of the book ourselves by clicking those links above. On what basis other than your own egotism have you determined the extent of my education? It purported to arcjko an official report of the trial and death of Jesus made directly to the Roman Emperor Tiberius by Pilate as governor of Judaea. These apocryphal works fall into 3 categories:. Mahan would use all proper efforts to heal the wounds his course had inflicted; and, Whereas, It now comes to the knowledge of this Pres.
They were useful as commentaries on the OT Canon, but where they differed from the canon they were acknowledged to be in error. Two letters written by Pilate and Caiaphas.
December 17, at 2: In fact, bright lights lend more credence to UFOs than angelic choirs. March 20, at 7: The work presented in the early pamphlet, however, predates the Rev. Photoluminescence is a quality common among creatures of the deep trenches, which are largely inaccessible to man. If you think the Archko, which ovlumes historical errors, Biblical contradictions and obvious anachronisms is more inspiring than the Bible, then your religious studies at San Jose State were a waste of time, sir.
Volumex 22, at 9: The book was assembled and promoted by a Protestant minister and such things like the baby Jesus talking from birth and a romantic relationship between Mary and Jesus has absolutely no basis in Catholic doctrine. Goodspeed says that nothing is known about where this Boston pamphlet came from, but he does analyze the contents sufficiently well to show that it is historically improbable.
April 10, at 9: Vo,umes Ray Stackon says: The Reverend does not seem to be immune to the lure of money. Does look like old dude made it up and copied Ben Hur though. Yet this does not excuse us from determining what can be falsified.