Description. ASTM G Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. View more. ASTM G()e1. Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements. ASTM-G Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements – corrosion.
|Published (Last):||5 July 2014|
|PDF File Size:||20.14 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This practice is intended to provide guidance in calculating mass loss asym penetration rates for such alloys. Rp 5 Ra 2 rl 11 where: This will cause either the anodic or cathodic b value to appear smaller than the corrosion reaction above.
Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters.
Current edition approved Feb. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Although the conversion of these current values into mass loss rates or penetration rates is based on Faraday’s Law, the calculations can be complicated for alloys and metals with elements having multiple valence values. This practice is intended to provide guidance in calculating mass loss and penetration rates for such alloys.
Icor icor 5 A 1 where: Values zstm 65 and mV are also commonly used. This will make results from different studies more comparable and minimize calculation errors that may occur in transforming electrochemical results to corrosion rate values. Some approaches for estimating this information are given.
These diagrams are known as Potential-pH Pourbaix diagrams and have been published by several authors 2, 3. In general, Eq 7 and Eq 8 may be used, and the corrosion rate calculated by these two approximations may be used as lower and upper limits of the true rate.
A sample calculation is given in Appendix X4. It is usually assumed that the g02 of oxidation is uniform and Copyright?
The estimation of a B value for situations asttm mixed control requires more information in general and is beyond the scope of this standard. Some typical values of equivalent weights for a variety of metals and alloys are provided.
In addition, some guidelines for converting polarization resistance values to corrosion rates are provided. For simple one electron reactions, K is usually found to be 2.
In the case of galvanic couples, the exposed area of the anodic specimen should be used. Therefore, the gram equivalents of the dissolved components are given by Eq 3. W 5 the atomic weight of the element, and n 5 the number of electrons required to oxidize an atom of the element in the corrosion process, that is, the valence of the element.
The conversion of these results to either mass loss or penetration rates requires additional electrochemical information. A sample calculation is given in Appendix X6. Corrosion Current Density 4. A superscript epsilon e indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. Therefore, the alloy equivalent weight, EW, is the asmt of this quantity: Consider a unit mass of alloy oxidized. Generally, this error is small with modest scan rates Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend.
A sample calculation is given in Appendix X1. Consequently, the Stern-Geary constant B will be in? Other redox couples that do not necessarily participate in the corrosion reaction may have similar effects. In aatm computerized polarization equipment, this calculation is made automatically after the specimen area is programmed into the computer.
Some atsm for estimating this information are given. B5 ba bc 2. Normally only elements above 1 mass percent in the alloy are included in the calculation. Some typical values of equivalent weights for a variety of metals and alloys are provided. The effect of solution resistance is a function of the cell geometry, but the following expression may be used to approximate its magnitude.