In view of his talent and taking into account his recognition, the publishers of ” Ananda Vikatan” approached him to license his drawings for. Get your digital copy of Aval Vikatan Magazine – January 15, issue on Magzter and enjoy reading it on iPad, iPhone, Android devices and the web.
|Published (Last):||10 December 2009|
|PDF File Size:||6.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.14 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The appellant, along with the suit, filed an interlocutory application in O.
Cites 9 docs – [ View All ]. On the other hand, the first respondent specifically claimed that Silpi was an employee of Ananda Vikatan, and only in the said capacity he had drawn the pictures and cartoons and other artistic works.
The first respondent has already printed copies of book. For the song “Nee Kobappattal Naanum” from Villu. Sreenivasan, published earlier under the title “Thennattu Selvangal” in Ananda Vikatan during the period toas it would infringe the copyright of the legal representatives of the artist.
The ceremony’s main broadcaster is Sun TV. The Managing Director of Vikatan Publishers, first respondent in the interlocutory application, filed a counter affidavit in O. Prahlad Singh1 SCCobserved that prima facie case alone is not sufficient to grant injunction. We are therefore of the view that interest of justice would be subserved in case the following directions are issued: This page was last edited on 14 Octoberat For the song “Naan Nee” from Madras.
Silpi had drawn more than drawings over a career spread over more than 50 years. The Supreme Court in Dalpat Kumar vs. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be mergedredirectedor deleted. The counter affidavit shows that the first respondent has decided to publish the collection of already published works in a book form under the very same title “Thennattu Selvangal”.
Naduvula Konjam Pakkatha Kaanom. The object of the Copyright Act is to protect the author of the work from the possible fraudulent reproduction of the work without his permission. The name of Silpi as the author of the work is disclosed in the books along with Silpi’s photo printed on book’s cover.
We are in complete agreement with the views expressed by the learned Single Judge.
For the song “Mannipaaya” from Vinnaithaandi Varuvaayaa. The famous Tamil poet Namakkal Kavingar recognized his talent and made him to join in the Government School of Arts and Crafts at Madras, sometime during Because of the difference in colour, it cannot be said that the publisher is guilty of distortion.
The first respondent has included the black and white copies of the pictures in the book. Each book is priced at Rs.
Dhaam Dhoom Vaaranam Aayiram. Therefore, we are cikatan the considered view that the appellant has not satisfied the trinity of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. Therefore, the ownership of copyright vested only with Silpi and the appellant viktaan the said right.
Avap Vikatan Cinema Awards is an annual award presenting ceremony for people in the Tamil film industry. The act would amount to infringement of copyright and as such, the appellant was constrained to file the suit for injunction to restrain the respondents from publishing the works of Silpi in any form.
For the song “Va Machane” from Irudhi Suttru. So long as the republication is confined only to the already published works, made during the currency of employment, the legal representatives of the author cannot be heard to say that the magazine vkatan be injuncted from republishing 22013 works.
Though the duration of course was six years, Silpi, with his extra talents, completed the course in three years. The texts prepared by Silpi were edited by the editorial team of Ananda Vikatan and thereafter, the works were published in the magazine under the title “Thennatu Selvangal”.
For the song “Mukundha Mukundha” from Dasavathaaram. The first of such statement shall be filed on or before 31 January and 201, once in three months.
Therefore, we are of the view that the appellant has not made out a prima facie case. The awards were introduced in the yearhonouring the films that were released in The present attempt is only compilation and reproduction of the very same art works in the form of a book.
There is no dispute with regard to the factual position that the art works published in Ananda Vikatan under the title “Thennattu Selvangal” during the period to were all created by Silpi. Therefore the appellant has no cause of action against the respondents. For the song “Azhagaai Pookkuthey” from Ninaithale Inikkum. The documents available on record are more than sufficient to arrive at a prima facie case that Silpi was an employee of Ananda Vikatan at least from to The proprietor of the magazine is given a legal right to reproduce the work for the purpose of publication.
For the song “Unnai Kanadhu” from Vishwaroopam. Srinivasan in the field of aal in its various forms was appreciated by one and avap. This article needs additional citations for verification.
The learned Judge, from the documents available on record arrived at a prima facie case that late Silpi functioned only as an employee vikaatn to Ennamo Nadakkudhu Velaiilla Pattadhari.
The write up produced by the respondents contains a reference that Silpi left Ananda Vikatan which he had served for years and joined Bhavans Journal in Bombay.
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guideline for events. Srinivasan, a well known and renowned artist. His drawings were given to the magazine for publication on license basis. He was a freelance artist.