Dan Puric – Cine Suntem. Antrenamentul de uitare la care este supus poporul roman, astazi, face ca gandirea si inima sa se roteasca pe loc si, din aceasta rotire. Cine Suntem (Romanian Text) [Dan Puric] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Antrenamentul de uitare la care este supus poporul roman. Best books like Cine suntem: #1 The Source of My Strength: Relying on the life- changing power of Jesus Christ to heal our wounded hearts #2 Deșertul pen.
|Published (Last):||3 March 2012|
|PDF File Size:||14.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Statutul fiintal al romanului ca tristete ontologica nu-l paralizeaza pe acesta in credinta sa, ci din contra, paradoxal, il intareste. Peste ea a cazut necrutator, nedrept si barbar, istoria, iar dincolo de istorie, cu mult in afara ei, comunismul. He never mentions the Romanian people during the Communist regime as being active, but only passive; cruel things have happened to them, they were forced to endure, they were killed, tortured, they sungem the victims of external weapons.
Caci adevarata dsn crestina nu inseamna suspendarea necazului prin asteptarea optimista, ci dann acesteia, a suferintei, ca poarta ce-l duce spre pragul mantuirii.
He considers his endeavor a vital exercise of anamnesis which should be done in order to regain the national conscience forgotten along the way. Puric excludes, in his concept of nationalism, the intolerance based on ethnic, religious or racial grounds, and he stands against adapting and applying external, foreign policies and social norms, practiced by other nations or communities, to Romania, situating himself against the duntem nationalist discourse and tendencies.
His ideology is a — sometimes paradoxical — mixture of conservative, radicalist and anarchist attitudes, out of which the predominant one seems to be the latter.
Trece prin istorie, prin meteorologia istoriei, si dainuieste. Termenul de natiune este unul contingent. Dar, pe dedesubt, era o fibra comunicationala extraordinara.
Nationalist Discourse in Contemporary Romania: The communist past is completely separated from the natural evolution of events: Dar exista o alta Romanie. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr. Therefore, he sjntem both the present and the recent past.
Taking Dobrogea as a representative model for Romania is a faulty synecdoche, as it is sufficient to go up or left on the map in order to clash with the conflicts between Romanians cone Rromas, Hungarians, and other ethnic groups.
Ce-ar fi sa trimitem noi Europei un articol si sa intrebam: Who are we anymore? Natiunea este un construct istoric si unul politic. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Along with this unfortunate period came the following one, continued in the present. He is invited to prime time talk shows on national holidays, he keeps his conferences in the Hall of the Romanian Athenaeum, he reaches his audiences through various media; therefore, the counter-discourse offered by Puric which challenges the legitimacy of the official nationalist discourse becomes mainstream.
It is common in nationalist discourses to offer a coherent version of history in order to achieve continuity and Puric tries to bridge the past and the projected future, as well; however, puricc downside of this technique is the omission or distortion of simple cien — not only are there mystifications and exaggerations of Romanian figures and events for the benefit of its image, but the selection of representative parts for the whole nation is, obviously, biased.
Although his theories dna the pruic of different, sometimes diverging ideological influences, the centrality of the Romanian neamthe focus on a God-given, transcendental community and the irrational manner of reassessing the archetypal connection between the Romanian people and their distinctness from the political authorities or unions suggest an anarchist choice of rhetoric.
Given its transcendental and encompassing value, ouric neam is able not only to survive the superficial socio-political contracts, legislation, unions, but also to escape them and generate a natural model of self-governance: Noi n-aveam nevoie de multiculturalism.
Acum se discuta de un fel de daan multipla. The partial or full reproduction of this website’s content without secured permission by san or proper citing is forbidden. This time, the Romanian people are again the passive figures: Oxford University Press, Eu vin si spun specialistului astuia in multiidentitate: Printr-un metabolism de asimilare istoric, in Dobrogea sunt tatari, evrei, armeni, greci, nu mai stiu cati altii, bulgari, albanezi.
Print Niessen, James P. In sensul acesta, de dainuire, ce poate sa ofere poporul roman Comunitatii Europene?
His media appearances weigh significantly in entertainment, through the role-playing, anecdotes, and jokes that he interprets; his speech is destined to reach a heterogeneous, television-watching audience, being delivered either in talk-shows or in non-academic conferences; his loquacity and spontaneity have won him the sympathy of his public, therefore his definitions of Romanian national identity pass to the listener smoothly, almost subliminally, as if they were products being advertised for.
Unlike an anarchist, who would not praise any kind of alternative state or legal authority, Dan Puric turns to the Conservative Nationalist tradition of the 19 th century in an attempt to reassess the true values of the Romanians who only then have managed to surface, to be acknowledged and to shape the nation from within.
Written by Adriana ianuarie 15, la 2: